• بیگدلی، حمید. و طیبی، جواد. (1397). روش برنامه‌ریزی ریاضی برای حل و مدل‌سازی سناریوهای نبرد در سامانه پشتیبان تصمیم بازی جنگ تاکتیکی و عملیاتی، فصلنامه آینده‌پژوهی دفاعی، 3 (9): 56-35.
• شادرام، وحید.، بیگدلی، حمید. و همت، حمید. (1398). مدل‌سازی و حل مسأله تعارض دولت–تروریست با استفاده از بازی دیفرانسیلی، فصلنامه آینده پژوهی دفاعی، 4 (13): 86-61.

• An, B. (2017, August). Game Theoretic Analysis of Security and Sustainability. In IJCAI (pp. 5111-5115).
• An, B., Ordóñez, F., Tambe, M., Shieh, E., Yang, R., Baldwin, C., ... & Meyer, G. (2013). A deployed quantal response-based patrol planning system for the US Coast Guard. Interfaces, 43(5), 400-420.‏
• Bigdeli, H., & Hassanpour, H. (2018). An approach to solve multi-objective linear production planning games with fuzzy parameters. Yugoslav Journal of Operations Research, 28(2), 237-248.‏
•  Bigdeli, H., Hassanpour, H., & Tayyebi, J. (2017). Optimistic and Pessimistic Solutions of Single and Multi-Objective Matrix Games with Fuzzy Payoffs and Analysis of Some Military Cases.
• Brown, G., Carlyle, M., Diehl, D., Kline, J., & Wood, K. (2005). A two-sided optimization for theater ballistic missile defense. Operations research, 53(5), 745-763.
• Cohen, F., & Koike, D. (2004, June). Misleading attackers with deception. In Proceedings from the Fifth Annual IEEE SMC Information Assurance Workshop, 2004. (pp. 30-37). IEEE.‏
• Conitzer, V., & Sandholm, T. (2006, June). Computing the optimal strategy to commit to. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM conference on Electronic commerce (pp. 82-90).‏
• Ehrgott, M. (2005). Multicriteria optimization (Vol. 491). Springer Science & Business Media.‏
• Ezzati, R., Khorram, E., & Enayati, R. (2015). A new algorithm to solve fully fuzzy linear programming problems using the MOLP problem. Applied mathematical modelling, 39(12), 3183-3193.
• Fang, F., Nguyen, T. H., Pickles, R., Lam, W. Y., Clements, G. R., An, B., ... & Lemieux, A. (2016, February). Deploying PAWS: Field Optimization of the Protection Assistant for Wildlife Security. In AAAI (Vol. 16, pp. 3966-3973).
• Jain, M., Kardes, E., Kiekintveld, C., Ordónez, F., & Tambe, M. (2010, July). Security games with arbitrary schedules: A branch and price approach. In AAAI.‏
• Kiekintveld, C., Jain, M., Tsai, J., Pita, J., Ordóñez, F., & Tambe, M. (2009, May). Computing optimal randomized resource allocations for massive security games. In Proceedings of The 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems-Volume 1 (pp. 689-696).‏
• Lye, K. W., & Wing, J. M. (2005). Game strategies in network security. International Journal of Information Security, 4(1-2), 71-86.‏
• Paruchuri, P., Kraus, S., Pearce, J. P., Marecki, J., Tambe, M., & Ordonez, F. (2008). Playing games for security: An efficient exact algorithm for solving Bayesian Stackelberg games.‏
• Pita, J., Jain, M., Marecki, J., Ordóñez, F., Portway, C., Tambe, M., ... & Kraus, S. (2008, May). Deployed ARMOR protection: the application of a game theoretic model for security at the Los Angeles International Airport. In Proceedings of the 7th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems: industrial track (pp. 125-132).‏
• Pita, J., Jain, M., Ordónez, F., Portway, C., Tambe, M., Western, C., ... & Kraus, S. (2009). Using game theory for Los Angeles airport security. AI magazine, 30(1), 43-43.‏
• Sakawa, M. (2013). Fuzzy sets and interactive multiobjective optimization. Springer science & business media.‏
• Sandler, T. & D. G. A. M. (2003). Terrorism and Game Theory, Simulation and Gaming, 34 (3): 319–337.
• Tambe, M. (2011). Security and game theory: algorithms, deployed systems, lessons learned. Cambridge University Press.
• Tambe, M., Jiang, A. X., An, B., & Jain, M. (2014, March). Computational game theory for security: Progress and challenges. In AAAI spring symposium on applied computational game theory.‏
• Trejo, K. K., Clempner, J. B., & Poznyak, A. S. (2015). A Stackelberg security game with random strategies based on the extraproximal theoretic approach. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 37, 145-153.

 Yin, Z., Korzhyk, D., Kiekintveld, C., Conitzer, V., & Tambe, M. (2010, May). Stackelberg vs. Nash in security games: Interchangeability, equivalence, and uniqueness. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems: volume 1-Volume 1 (pp. 1139-1146).‏