• حورعلی، مریم.، منتظری، عباس. و الیاسی، مهدی. (1394). شناسایی و اولویت بندی اصول مورد نیاز برای بهبود فضای نوآوری بنگاه­های دفاعی ایران با رویکرد باز، مجله مدیریت نوآوری، 4(2): 68-57.
• محمد، عسکری. (1398). مدل جذب در سازمان‌های دانش بنیان دفاعی با رویکرد آینده‌پژوهی، فصلنامه علمی آینده‌پژوهی دفاعی. 4(3): 168-143.
• جعفر، محمودی. و عبدالمهدی، صالحی‌زاده. (1398). آینده­نگاری نتایج مدیریت سبد پروژه­های تحقیقاتی در سازمان پروژه محور دفاعی با رویکرد پویایی­شناسی سیستم. فصلنامه علمی آینده‌پژوهی دفاعی، 4(2): 59-35.
  • Amiri, M.K., Feizi, A.M. Fakoor S, & Olfat, L. (2014). A model of Supply chain resilience for competitiveness in Iranian automotive companies, Journal of Production and Operation management, 5(1):143-164.
  • Basu, P., Liu, Q. & Stallaert, J. (2019). Supply chain management using put optioncontracts with information asymmetry. International Journal of Production Research, 57(6):1772-1796.
  • Christopher, M. (2014). Logestics & Supply Chain Management, Pearson Education Limited, 7(16):14-33.
  • Ciliberti, F., De Haan, J., De Groot, G.& Pontrandolfo, P. (2011) .CSR codes and the principal-agent problem in supply chains: four case studies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(8): 885-894.
  • Dator, J. (2019). What futures studiesis, and is not. In Jim Dator, A Noticer in Time, 11(8):3-5.
  • Delbufalo, E. (2018). Agency Theory and Supply Chain Management,A Literature Review. In Agency Theory and Sustainability in the Global Supply Chain, 57(16):12-30.
  • Delbufalo, E. (2018). Agency Theory and Supply Chain Management: A Literature Review. In Agency Theory and Sustainability in the Global Supply Chain .12(5):1-15.
  • Godet, M., Durance, P. & Coates, J. (2008). Strategic foresight. France, Lipsor Working Paper Publ, 115(8):52-114.
  • Junior, F. R. L. & Carpinetti, L. R. L. (2014). A comparison between Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy Topsis methods to supplier, Applied Soft Computing, 27(114):194-209.
  • Kar, A, k. (2015). A hybrid group decision support system for supplier selection using analytic hierarchy process. Fuzzy set theory and neural network, Journal of Computational Scince, 12(25):23-33.
  • Liang, X., Shen, G. Q. & Guo, L. (2019). Optimizing Incentive Policy of Energy-Efficiency Retrofit in Public Buildings: A Principal-Agent Model.Sustainability, 11(12):34-42.
  • Moghadam, K. S. (2015). Fuzzy multi-objective model for supplier selection and order allocation in reverse logistics systems under supply and demand uncertainty, Exoert System with Applications,15 (112):6237-6254.
  • Pettit, Timothy J., Keely L. Croxton, & Joseph, F. (2019). The Evolution of Resilience in SupplyChain Management, a Retrospective on Ensuring Supply Chain Resilience. Journal of Business Logistics, 40(1):56-65.
  • Rajeev, A., Pati, R. K., Padhi, S. S. & Govindan, K. (2017). Evolution of sustainability in supply chain management, a literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 27(5):299-314.
  • Rasouli, M. R., Kusters, R. J., Trienekens, J. J. & Grefen, P. W.(2019). Service orientation in business networking: a demand-supply chain perspective. Production Planning & Control, 30(1):2-19.
  • Rebs, T., Brandenburg, M. & Seuring, S. (2019). System dynamics modeling for sustainable supply chain management: A literature review and systems thinking approach. Journal of cleaner production, 7(208):1265-1280.
  • Safriliana, R., Subroto, B., Subekti, I. & Rahman, A. F. (2019).Overviews of contracting theory & agency theory: determinants public accounting firms switching on voluntary. International Journal of Organizational Innovation, 1(3):87-102.
  • Sun, D. Q., Ma, X. Y., Wang, D. J. & Li, J. J. (2019). Principal–agent problem for returns handling in a reverse supply chain with one manufacturer and two competing dealers. Applied Mathematical Modeling, 4(66):118-140.
  • Takemura, K. (2019). Nonlinear Utility Theory and Prospect Theory Eliminating the Paradoxes of Linear Expected Utility Theory. In Foundations of Economic Psychology, 4 (15):83-119.

Yawar, S. A. & Seuring, S. (2017). Management of social issues in supply chains: a literature review exploring social issues, actions and performance outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics, 141(3):621-643.