Defensive Future Studies

Defensive Future Studies

Developing geopolitical scenarios for Iran-Afghanistan relations in the Taliban era

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Phd Student in Political Geography, Faculty of Geography, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
2 Professor of Political Geography, Faculty of Geographical Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
3 Associate Professor of Political Geography, Faculty of Geographical Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
4 Professor, of Political Geography, Faculty of Geographical Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
10.22034/dfsr.2025.2058308.1898
Abstract
Objective: This research was conducted with a mixed approach (quantitative-qualitative) to develop geopolitical scenarios for Iran-Afghanistan relations in the Taliban era.
Method: Data were collected through library research, semi-structured interviews with experts, and a researcher-developed questionnaire. For data analysis, the study utilized Micmac software (for analyzing the cross-impact of key factors) and Scenario Wizard (for simulating future scenarios).
Findings: By identifying 24 probable situations linked to six key factors (migration, recognition of the Taliban, border tensions, water rights of border rivers, Chabahar transit security, and the role of major powers), over 4,510 combined scenarios were extracted. The final results revealed four scenarios with "strong consistency" as the most probable future trajectories: Critical scenario (33.33% likelihood): Characterized by illegal migration, the Helmand water conflict, competition among foreign powers, and border insecurity, transforming Afghanistan into a "security black hole" and triggering socio-economic crises in Iran. Semi-critical scenario (28.14% likelihood). Static scenario (28.57% likelihood): Marked by "fragile stability," normalizing tensions such as water and border disputes. Favorable scenario (23.80% likelihood): Achievable through multilateral diplomacy, conditional recognition of the Taliban, and linking Chabahar to Afghanistan, enabling regional convergence.
Conclusion: The results indicate that the dominance of critical trends undermines Iran’s strategic position as the "Gateway to Central Asia" and jeopardizes border security. However, the favorable scenario demonstrates that economic-security cooperation and mediation by international institutions could transform Afghanistan from a proxy battleground into a communication bridge. This study emphasizes the necessity of breaking the cycle of tension and prioritizing long-term interests.
Keywords

Subjects


  •  

    • Yousefi Kharayem, M., Yousefi, A., Ghassemi, H., & Darvishi Sehtelani, F. (2021). A framework for analyzing defensive geopolitical issues based on strategic foresight. Defense Futures Research, 6(20), 115–136. ]In persian[ https://doi.org/10.22034/DFSR.2021.128981.1396
    • Johnson, T. H., DuPee, M., & Shaaker, W. (2017). Taliban narratives: The use and power of stories in the Afghanistan conflict. Oxford University Press.URL: https://global.oup.com/academic/product/taliban-narratives-9780190691503
    • Karimi Fard, H. (2021). Explaining Iran's foreign policy toward the Taliban (1996–2021). Middle East Studies, 28(3), 41–60. ]In persian[.https://doi.org/20.1001.1.15601986.1400.28.3.3.6
    • Khalili, M., Heidari, J., & Yari, M. (2012). Futures studies of foreign policy: The geopolitical code/genome of Iran and its neighbors. Futures Studies Quarterly, 3(3), 31–78. ]In persian[ https://www.magiran.com/p1450349
    • Krampe, F., Smith, E. S., & Hamidi, M. D. (2021). Security implications of climate development in conflict-affected states: implications of local-level effects of rural hydropower development on farmers in Herat. Political Geography, 90, 102454. DOI: 1016/j.polgeo.2021.102454
    • Lambach, D. (2023). Space, scale, and global politics: Towards a critical approach to space in international relations. Review of International Studies, 48(2), 282-300.‏ DOI: 1017/S026021052200057X
    • Landesz, T. (2023). Future of Geopolitics. Future Intelligence, 29.‏ DOI: 1016/j.polgeo.2021.102464
    • Lawson, F. H., & Legrenzi, M. (2024). Iran’s Troubled Relations with Afghanistan and Tajikistan: A Compound Alignment Dilemma. The International Spectator, 59(2), 127-146.‏ DOI: 1080/03932729.2024.2307524
    • Lotfi, H. (2015). A geopolitical analysis of Afghanistan-Iran relations: Challenges and opportunities. Khorasan-e Bozorg Research Journal, 6(19), 57–75. ]In persian[ https://sid.ir/paper/512298/fa
    • Mahgol, S., Zarei, G., & Ravanbad, A. (2024). Challenges and opportunities of Iran's foreign policy toward Afghanistan (Case study: Taliban rule). Quarterly Journal of Geography (Regional Planning), 14(54), 50–68. ]In persian[ https://doi.org/10.22034/jgeoq.2024.283837.3043
    • Malkasian, C. (2021). The American war in Afghanistan: A history. Oxford University Press. URL:https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-american-war-in-afghanistan-9780197550756
    • Manchanda, N., & Turner, O. (2024). From frontier-making to world-making: The enduring power of frontiers in South Asia. Political Geography, 113, 103133. DOI: 1016/j.polgeo.2024.103133
    • Mirhosseini, F., & Eivazi, M. R. (2019). Scenarios for the future geopolitical position of the Islamic Republic of Iran in the regional power system of West Asia by 2031. Basij Strategic Studies, 22(83), 143–169. ]In persian[ https://share.sid.ir/paper/404134/fa?media=1
    • Montazeran, J., & Ghorbani, S. (2016). Futures studies of Iran's national security in the context of geopolitical developments, territorial integrity, and internal crises in Iraq. Defense Policy Journal, 25(5), 115–144. ]In persian[ https://doi.org/20.1001.1.10255087.1395.25.97.4.1
    • M. Shahidi, S. M., Zarei, B., Pishgahifard, Z., Badi’i Azandahi, M., & Vasegh, M. (2021). Theoretical explanation of the foundations of geopolitical relations and presenting a proposed model. Human Geography Research, 53(3), 811–832. ]In Persian [https://doi.org/10.22059/JHGR.2020.290878.1008024
    • Mozhdeh, V. (2021). Afghanistan and five years of Taliban rule. Nashr-e Ney. ]In persian[
    • Nasirpour, G., Jamali, A., & Valipouri Goodarzi, A. (2024). Identifying components and indicators for feasibility of establishing missile command in the Islamic Republic of Iran Army .Journal of War Studies, 6 (23), 1-28. ]In persian[ https://doi.org/10.22034/qjws.2024.2041856.1243
    • Palle, A. (2021). Bringing geopolitics to energy transition research. Energy Research & Social Science, 81, 102233.‏ DOI: 1016/j.erss.2021.102233
    • Pishgahifard, Z., Ranjbar Dastnaei, K., & Kushki, M. (2019). A futuristic approach to the geopolitical situation of Makran coasts: The GBN approach. Quarterly Journal of Geography (Regional Planning), 9(35), 135–145. ]In persian[ https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.22286462.1398.9.3.33.1
    • Rashid, A. (2022). Taliban: The power of militant Islam in Afghanistan and beyond. Yale University Press. URL:https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300269781/taliban/
    • Ruhzendeh, J. (2005). A review of the history of political relations between Iran and Afghanistan (from the early Qajar period to the rise of the Taliban) and other resulting crises. Nashr-e Sobhdem. ]In persian[.
    • Ruttig, T. (2021). Have the Taliban changed. Combating Terrorism Center Sentinel, 14(3), 1-15. URL: https://ctc.westpoint.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/CTCSentinel-Vol14Iss3.pdf
    • Sakhi, N. (2023). Regional Security Complexity and Multilateral Diplomacy: A case study of Afghanistan and its Regional Neighbors (China, Pakistan, Iran, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and Tajikistan). International Journal of Security Studies & Practice, 3(1). DOI: 59052/ijssap.v3i1.33
    • Sarlak, B., & Adami, A. (2024). A comparative analysis of Iran and Afghanistan's patterns of competition and cooperation during the National Unity Government and Taliban eras. Foreign Relations Quarterly, 16(4), 59–88. ]In persian[ https://doi.org/10.22034/fr.2025.480085.1582
    • Shabani, M., Valivand Zamani, H., Moradian, M., & Riazi, V. (2024). Clausewitz's strategic judgment versus Kant's synthetic a priori judgment: A phenomenological study. Military Sciences and Techniques, 20 (70), 5-44. ]In persian[ https://doi.org/10.22034/qjmst.2024.2038644.2095
    • Shafiei, N. (2023). From cooperation to competition: An analysis of Iran-Taliban relations. Political and International Approaches, 14(4), 35. ]In persian[ https://doi.org/10.48308/piaj.2023.232091.1430
    • Sheikh Ghafouri, H., Babri Gonbad, S., & Dehshiar, H. (2020). Explaining the process of desecuritization in Iran-Afghanistan relations (2000–2019). Fundamental and Applied Studies of the Islamic World, 2(4), 25–49. ]In persian[ https://sid.ir/paper/398733/fa
    • Simandan, D. (2023). Geographies of the Future. Oxford Bibliographies. Available at: https://www. oxfordbibliographies. com/display/document/obo-9780199874002/obo-9780199874002-0257. xml.‏URL: https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/display/document/obo-9780199874002/obo-9780199874002-0257.xml
    • Squire, R. (2024). Critical Geopolitics. In The Encyclopedia of Human Geography (pp. 1-9). Cham: Springer International Publishing.‏ ‏ DOI: 1007/978-3-031-27961
    • Stenersen, A. (2010). The Taliban insurgency in Afghanistan-organization, leadership and worldview. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267860269_
    • Tulga, A. Y. (2022). Constructivism, Identity, and Discourse in Terrorism. Journal of Politics and Policy, 4(2), 1-22.‏ DOI: 33774/jotapp.4.2.375
    • Wang, Q., Ren, F., & Li, R. (2024). Geopolitics and energy security: a comprehensive exploration of evolution, collaborations, and future directions. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1-26.‏ DOI: 1057/s41599-024-02685-6
    • Whitlock, C. (2021). The Afghanistan papers: A secret history of the war. Simon and Schuster.URL: https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/The-Afghanistan-Papers/Craig-Whitlock/9781982159042