Factors Influencing the Cyber Range: A Framework for ‎Preparing and Simulating Future Cyber-Based Battles

Ghasemi  Tadavani, Mohammad; Partovi, Mohammad Taghi; Bigdeli, Hamid; Ramezanzadeh, Mojtaba

doi:10.22034/dfsr.2026.2080098.1990

Factors Influencing the Cyber Range: A Framework for ‎Preparing and Simulating Future Cyber-Based Battles

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Mohammad Ghasemi Tadavani ¹

Mohammad Taghi Partovi ²

Hamid Bigdeli ³

Mojtaba Ramezanzadeh ⁴

¹ PHD Student of Defense Management‎/IRI Military Command and Staff University/ Tehran/ Iran

² Assistant Professor of Operations Research‎/IRI Military Command and Staff University/ Tehran/ Iran

³ Associate Professor of Operations Research/IRI Military Command and Staff University/ Tehran/ Iran

⁴ Assistant Professor of Cyber/IRI Military Command and Staff University/ Tehran/ Iran

10.22034/dfsr.2026.2080098.1990

Abstract

Background and Objective: The rapid integration of information ‎technologies into the operational domains of land, sea, air, ‎and ‎space has transformed the battlefield into a multilayered, data-‎driven environment that ‎depends on human–machine interaction. ‎The cyber range, as a critical infrastructure, enables ‎force training, ‎doctrinal testing, and improved decision-making. The objective of ‎this study is ‎to analyze the effects of the physical, virtual and ‎command/management layers on the ‎effectiveness of the cyber ‎range.‎
Methods: This research is descriptive in nature and employs a ‎mixed-methods approach. The qualitative ‎analysis involved ‎reviewing specialized documents and conducting expert ‎interviews. The ‎quantitative analysis was carried out using ‎correlation analysis and multivariate regression in ‎order to ‎determine the extent to which each layer influences the dependent ‎variable.‎
Findings: The results indicate that the physical, virtual and ‎command/management layers all have ‎positive, direct, and ‎statistically significant relationships with the cyber range. The ‎physical ‎layer, with the highest standardized beta coefficient, was ‎identified as the strongest predictor, ‎emphasizing the critical role ‎of infrastructure and hardware in ensuring realism and stability. ‎‎The virtual and command layers respectively contribute to ‎enhancing interactivity and the ‎effective utilization of the range. ‎The coefficient of determination (R² = 0.941) demonstrates ‎the ‎high explanatory power of the proposed model.‎
Conclusions: The success of cyber ranges requires integration and ‎synergy among all three layers. These ‎findings suggest that the ‎design and development of cyber ranges are not only a ‎technological ‎necessity, but also a strategic imperative for ‎readiness, deterrence, and superiority in future ‎multi-domain ‎warfare.‎

Keywords

Cyber range layer

Physical layer

Virtual layer

Command/management layer

Subjects

Futures Studies in the Field of Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare.

- Bruvoll, S, Hannay, J. E. Svendsen, G, Asprusten, M. L, Fauske, K. M, Kvernelv, V. B, ... & Hyndøy, J. I. (2015, October). Simulation-supported wargaming for analysis of plans. In Proc. NATO Modelling and Simulation Group Symp. on M&S Support to Operational Tasks Including War Gaming, Logistics, Cyber Defence (STO-MP-MSG-133).‏ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1548512919896855

- Carroll, J. M. (2023, June). Agile Methods For Improved Cyber Operations Planning. In ECCWS 2023 22nd European Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security (No. 1). Academic Conferences and publishing limited.‏ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.01.314

- Colbert, E. J, & Kott, A. (Eds). (2016). Cyber-security of SCADA and other industrial control systems (Vol. 66). Springer International Publishing. ‏DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32125-7

- Colbert, E. J, Sullivan, D. T, & Kott, A. (2017). Cyber-physical war gaming. Journal of Information Warfare, 16(3), 119-133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1708.07424

- Colbert, E, Sullivan, D, Wong, K, Smith, S, Stephenson, S, Sfakianoudis, V, ... & Andes, R. (2015). RED and BLUE teaming of a US Army SCADA system: table-top exercise final report. US Army Research Lab. Technical Report ARL-TR-7497.‏ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1548512918795061

- Evensen, P. I, Martinussen, S. E, Halsør, M, & Bentsen, D. H. (2019). Wargaming evolved: Methodology and best practices for simulation-supported wargaming.‏ URL: https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2652599

- Ghasemi Tadavani,M, Ali Mohammadi,S. and HAJI ALIAKBARI,M. (2025). Resilience in future cyber command and control. Defensive Future Studies, 9(35), 27-60. [in Persian] DOI:‎ https://doi.org/10.22034/dfsr.2025.2046026.1852

- Gortney, W. E. (2010). Department of defense dictionary of military and associated terms (No. JP102).‏ URL: https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/AD1024397.pdf

- Gurnani, R, Pandey, K, & Rai, S. K. (2014, March). A scalable model for implementing Cyber Security Exercises. In 2014 International Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development (INDIACom). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/IndiaCom.2014.6828048

- Hoffendahl, A. (2022). The Cyber Wargame Commodity Course of Action Automated Analysis Method.‏ Theses and Dissertations. 5389. URL: https://scholar.afit.edu/etd/5389

- Holm, H, & Sommestad, T. (2016, November). Sved: Scanning, vulnerabilities, exploits and detection. In MILCOM 2016-2016 IEEE Military Communications Conference (pp. 976-981). IEEE.‏ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MILCOM.2016.7795457

- Kick, J. (2014). Cyber exercise playbook. Tech. rep. MITRE CORP BED FORD MA, (No. MP140714). URL: https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA624910.pdf

- Kuehl, D. T. (2009). From cyberspace to cyberpower: Defining the problem. Cyberpower and national security, 30.‏ URL: https://ndupress.ndu.edu/ -Chap-02.pdf

- Kuehn, K. (2021). Assessment strategies for educational wargames. Journal of Advanced Military Studies, 12(2), 139-153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21140/mcuj.20211202005

- Lantto, H, Åkesson, B, Suojanen, M, Tuukkanen, T, Huopio, S, Nikkarila, J. P, & Ristolainen, M. (2019). Wargaming the cyber resilience of structurally and technologically different networks. Security and Defence Quarterly, 24(2), 51-64.‏ DOI: https://doi.org/10.35467/sdq/103346

- Lawshe, C.H. (1975). A QUANTITATIVE APPROACH TO CONTENT VALIDITY. Personnel Psychology, 28, 563-575. URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x

- Mahmoud, R.V, Kidmose, E, Broholm, R, Pilawka, O. P, Dominika Illés, D, Magnussen, R, & Pedersen, J.M. (2020). Attack and Defend: Combining Game-Based Learning with Virtual Cyber Labs. In P. Fotaris (Ed.), Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Games Based Learning (pp. 364-371). Academic Conferences International (ACI). DOI: https://doi.org/10.34190/GBL.20.150

- Morgan, A. S, & Stone, S. W. (2019). Command and Control for Cyberspace Operations-A Call for Research. Military Cyber Affairs, 4(1), 2378-0789.‏ DOI: https://doi.org/10.5038/2378-0789.4.1.1051

- Pham, C, Tang, D, Chinen, K. I, & Beuran, R. (2016, December). Cyris: A cyber range instantiation system for facilitating security training. In Proceedings of the 7th Symposium on Information and Communication Technology (pp. 251-258).‏ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3011077.3011087

- Reddie, A. W, Booth, R. E, Goldblum, B. L, Lakkaraju, K, Reinhardt, J. C, Schneider, J, ... & DeMuth, J. (2024). Cyber Wargaming: Research and Education for Security in a Dangerous Digital World. Georgetown University Press. URL: https://press.georgetown.edu/Book/Cyber-Wargaming

- Rege, A, & Adams, J. (2019, July). The need for more sophisticated cyber-physical systems war gaming exercises. In ECCWS 2019 18th European conference on cyber warfare and security (p. 403). Academic Conferences and publishing limited.‏ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3375708.338031

- Singh, A. & Gupta, B. B. (2022). Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Attacks and Defense Mechanisms in Various Web-Enabled Computing Platforms: Issues, Challenges, and Future Research Directions. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS), 18(1), 1-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/IJSWIS.297143

- Staff, J. (2015). Joint training manual for the armed forces of the united states. Deparment of Defense, Washington DC. URL:https://www.jcs.mil/ CJCSM%203500.03F.pdf

- Taheri,M, Mohammad Zahraei,S. and mohammadi toudeshki,M. R. (2020). Technologies and approaches of cyber wargaming. (e122329). Iranian Journal of Wargaming, 3(6), e122329. ‎[in Persian]‎ DOI: https://doi.org/10.22034/ijwg.2020.122329

- Tsai, P. W, & Yang, C. S. (2018). Testbed@ TWISC: A network security experiment platform. International Journal of Communication Systems, 31(2), e3446.‏ DOI:: https://doi.org/10.1002/dac.3446

- Work, B, & Selva, P. (2015). Revitalizing wargaming is necessary to be prepared for future wars. War on the Rocks, 8. URL: https://warontherocks.com/2015/12/ for-future-wars

- Yamin, M. M, Katt, B, & Gkioulos, V. (2020). Cyber ranges and security testbeds: Scenarios, functions, tools and architecture. Computers & Security, 88, 101636.‏ DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2019.101636