Formulating the planning of government organizations with an institutional approach (case study: Sarovabad city)

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Director of the Department of Management at Payam Noor Marivan University, Kordestan, Iran.

Abstract

Organizations that are created based on the basic needs of society and with a strong and adaptable value system are called institutions. Government organizations are institutional in many ways because they meet the needs and demands of the society; Therefore, it is necessary to develop planning for government organizations with an institutional approach. In this research, the government organizations of Sarovabad city were selected as the subject of study and the type of strategic planning. This research in terms of practical purpose and in terms of descriptive-analytical nature; And to collect research data, field and documentary methods were used, all factors were collected through semi-structured interviews with 15 experts. Then, using the SWOT model and QSPM tool, the situation of Sarovabad city was examined and the strategies considered were prioritized. The results showed that the number of 108 extraction agents; Of these, 25 factors were for strengths, 54 factors were for weaknesses, 12 factors were for opportunities, and 17 factors were for threats. Also, among the four types of strategies (competitive, conservative, aggressive and competitive), defensive strategy was the most appropriate. and among the defensive strategies in order of importance of the strategy; The use of scientific methods and modern technology, the consensus of organizational managers for integrated organizational management and inter-organizational coordination, and the training of behavioral courses for employees were the most important strategies. This research will open the way for managers of city-level organizations to improve their performance to serve the people.

Keywords


  • Ben Messaoud, H. E. (2022). A Review on the Importance of Strategic Planning in Business. SSRG International Journal of Economics and Management Studies, 9(7): pp. 1-5.  
  • David, R. J. , & Bitektine, A. (2009). The deinstitutionalization of institutional theory? Exploring divergent agendas in institutional research. In D. Buchanan & A. Bryman (Eds.). The Sage handbook of organizational research methods, pp. 160–175.
  • David, R. J. , Tolbert, P. S. & Johnny, B. (2019). Institutional Theory in Organization Studies, business and management. Oxford University Press. https: //doi. org/10. 1093/acrefore/9780190224851. 013. 158.
  • George, T. (2022).  Semi-Structured Interview Definition, Guide & Examples. Retrieved February 22, 2023, from https: //www. scribbr. com/methodology/semi-structured-interview/
  • Gibbs, C. , Jonas, A. Suzanne, R. & Spooner, D. ( 2001). Governance, Institutional capacity and Partnership in Local Economic Development: Theoretical Issues and Empirical Evidence from the Humber. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. New Series, 26(1).
  • Janicijevic, N. (2014). The Institutional Organizational Theory As A New Research Framework For Understanding Contemporary Organizations.  Economic Themes, 52: 242 - 262.
  • Karakayaci, O. (2015). Relational and institutional approaches to planning issues in turkey, megaron journal, 10(4): 580-594.
  • Malik, S. , A. Al Khatani, N. S. Naushad, M. (2013). Integrating Ahp, Swot And Qspm In Strategic Planning- An Application To College Of Business Administration  In Saudi Arabia, Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Application to college of business administration.
  • Mandelbaum, S. J. (2016). The Institutional Focus of Planning Theory, Journal of  Planning Education and Research, 5(1): 22-32.
  • Menendez, I. & Rueda, D. (2015). Labor Market Institutions and Economic Performance. In: Routledge Handbook of Comparative Political Institutions, Gandhi and Ruiz-Rufino (eds.), Routledge Press, pp. 304-317.
  • Moroni, S. (2010). An Evolutionary Theory of Institutions and a Dynamic Approach to Reform. Planning Theory, 9(4): 275-297.
  • North, Douglass. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Parsons, T. (1960). Some ingredients of a formal theory of organization. In T. Parsons (Ed.), Structure and process in modern society, pp. 56–97. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
  • Pike, A. , Rodriguez-Pose, A. & Tomaney, J. (2006). Local and Regional Development: Routledge.
  • Rasouli, A. , Ketabchi khoonsari, M. ashja ardalan, S. saraee, F. & ahmadi, F. Z. (2020). The Importance of Strategic Planning and Management in Health: A Systematic  Health Management & Information Science, 7(1): 1-9.
  • Rivolin, U. J. (2012). Planning Systems as Institutional Technologies: A Proposed Conceptualization and the Implications for Comparison. Planning Practice and Research, 27(1): 63-85.
  • Sagasti, F, R. (1990). An institutional approach to national development planning. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 37(4): 321-334.
  • Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
  • Sumiarsih, Ni. M. , Legono, D. & Kodoatie R, J. (2018). Strategic Sustainable Management for Water Transmission System: A SWOT-QSPM Analysis. Journal of the Civil Engineering Forum, 4(1): 29-40.
  • Thoenig, J. C. (2011). Institutional Theories and Public Institutions, New Agendas and Appropriateness. Peters B. G. and J. Pierre. The Handbook of Public Administration, Sage, pp. 185-101.
  • Vargas-hernández, j. G. (2007). Institutional and neo-institutionalism theory in the international management of organizations, Universidad de Guadalajara Centro Universitario de Ciencias Económicas, Administrativas Periférico Norte, 799 Edificio G-306 - Zapopan, Jalisco C. P. 45100: Mexico.
  • Zulkarnain, A. , Wahyuningtias ,D. & Putranto, T. S. (2018). Analysis of IFE, EFE and QSPM matrix on business development strategy, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, doi: 10. 1088/1755-1315/ 126/1/012062.