Quantitative Modeling of Manufacturing Process, Storage and Optimal Distribution Agent Based Distribution Using Future Research Methods in the Defense Industry

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D,Student in Industrial Management, Department of Industrial Management Qazvin Branch Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran

2 Associate Prof, in Industrial Management, Department of Industrial Management Qazvin Branch Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran

3 Professor , in Governmental Management, Department of Governmental Management Research Sconces Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

4 Assistant Prof., National Security group of National Security Faculty National Defense Supreme Faculty of Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Due to the constraints that impede their inherent missions, the defense industry needs to seek a change of procedure to maintain the level of their products to meet their customers' needs One of these is to use a networking strategy.This study uses a basic model to consider supply chain concepts and dealership theory It intends to produce the product that customers want by using capabilities beyond the organizational boundary and representative network In this approach, the goal is not to reduce costs, but to increase the utility of the agent-owner-customer relationship.The proposed model is one of a variety of multi-purpose decision making models and aims to achieve optimal response, owner desirability and average agency desirability.The model is solved using weighted objective functions and a Pareto solution set. Then, using future research techniques, the variables affecting the organization and states of uncertainty of each variable are identified These variables include the amount of private equity investment, boom and bust, the prevalence of outsourcing, inflation and economic sanctions.According to the survey, the most important in future policy making are two variables of outsourcing activities and amount of private sector investment from the Pareto Answer Set, the answer is chosen as the final answer, which, by increasing the volume of outsourcing in the future, will create a powerful structure for managing outsourced activities and oversight of contractors and on the other hand, given the increased private sector investment in industries. Defensively,organization eliminates the need for proper oversight of the performance of this departmen

Keywords

References

  •  

    • Amiri, M.K., Feizi, A.M. Fakoor S, & Olfat, L. (2014). A model of Supply chain resilience for competitiveness in Iranian automotive companies, Journal of Production and Operation management, 5(1):143-164.
    • Basu, P., Liu, Q. & Stallaert, J. (2019). Supply chain management using put optioncontracts with information asymmetry. International Journal of Production Research, 57(6):1772-1796.
    • Christopher, M. (2014). Logestics & Supply Chain Management, Pearson Education Limited, 7(16):14-33.
    • Ciliberti, F., De Haan, J., De Groot, G.& Pontrandolfo, P. (2011) .CSR codes and the principal-agent problem in supply chains: four case studies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(8): 885-894.
    • Dator, J. (2019). What futures studiesis, and is not. In Jim Dator, A Noticer in Time, 11(8):3-5.
    • Delbufalo, E. (2018). Agency Theory and Supply Chain Management,A Literature Review. In Agency Theory and Sustainability in the Global Supply Chain, 57(16):12-30.
    • Delbufalo, E. (2018). Agency Theory and Supply Chain Management: A Literature Review. In Agency Theory and Sustainability in the Global Supply Chain .12(5):1-15.
    • Godet, M., Durance, P. & Coates, J. (2008). Strategic foresight. France, Lipsor Working Paper Publ, 115(8):52-114.
    • Junior, F. R. L. & Carpinetti, L. R. L. (2014). A comparison between Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy Topsis methods to supplier, Applied Soft Computing, 27(114):194-209.
    • Kar, A, k. (2015). A hybrid group decision support system for supplier selection using analytic hierarchy process. Fuzzy set theory and neural network, Journal of Computational Scince, 12(25):23-33.
    • Liang, X., Shen, G. Q. & Guo, L. (2019). Optimizing Incentive Policy of Energy-Efficiency Retrofit in Public Buildings: A Principal-Agent Model.Sustainability, 11(12):34-42.
    • Moghadam, K. S. (2015). Fuzzy multi-objective model for supplier selection and order allocation in reverse logistics systems under supply and demand uncertainty, Exoert System with Applications,15 (112):6237-6254.
    • Pettit, Timothy J., Keely L. Croxton, & Joseph, F. (2019). The Evolution of Resilience in SupplyChain Management, a Retrospective on Ensuring Supply Chain Resilience. Journal of Business Logistics, 40(1):56-65.
    • Rajeev, A., Pati, R. K., Padhi, S. S. & Govindan, K. (2017). Evolution of sustainability in supply chain management, a literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 27(5):299-314.
    • Rasouli, M. R., Kusters, R. J., Trienekens, J. J. & Grefen, P. W.(2019). Service orientation in business networking: a demand-supply chain perspective. Production Planning & Control, 30(1):2-19.
    • Rebs, T., Brandenburg, M. & Seuring, S. (2019). System dynamics modeling for sustainable supply chain management: A literature review and systems thinking approach. Journal of cleaner production, 7(208):1265-1280.
    • Safriliana, R., Subroto, B., Subekti, I. & Rahman, A. F. (2019).Overviews of contracting theory & agency theory: determinants public accounting firms switching on voluntary. International Journal of Organizational Innovation, 1(3):87-102.
    • Sun, D. Q., Ma, X. Y., Wang, D. J. & Li, J. J. (2019). Principal–agent problem for returns handling in a reverse supply chain with one manufacturer and two competing dealers. Applied Mathematical Modeling, 4(66):118-140.
    • Takemura, K. (2019). Nonlinear Utility Theory and Prospect Theory Eliminating the Paradoxes of Linear Expected Utility Theory. In Foundations of Economic Psychology, 4 (15):83-119.

Yawar, S. A. & Seuring, S. (2017). Management of social issues in supply chains: a literature review exploring social issues, actions and performance outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics, 141(3):621-643.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics