Defensive Future Studies

Defensive Future Studies

Technology Scouting Model: A Process & Structure for Monitoring Technological Changes

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Farzane Mir Shahvelayati 1
Farhad Nazarizadeh 2
1 Assistant Prof. in institute for humanities and cultural studies
2 PhD in future studies of Defense educational Institute, Ministry for Defense
10.22034/dfsr.2019.36542
Abstract
Nowadays, technological world is changing so fast that one of various organizations challenge is about getting informed and responding appropriately to them. In order to manage this challenge, organizations need to scout technological changes. As a result, this paper tries to introduce a generic model including the process (steps) and structure (components and their relations). In this regard, by studying and synthesizing the existing models about technology scanning, intelligence, scouting and monitoring, we try to develop a generic model. For this purpose, meta-synthesis methodology adopted. In order to measure our model reliability, we use the triangulation technique, which its tree angles are: literature review, case study and questionnaires. In fact, as existing models are not comprehensive and discuss just about one or some aspects of the technology scouting, the main value added of this paper is about leveraging positive aspects and strength points of each model in order to introducing a relatively comprehensive framework which includes all the components, relations and steps to do a perfect technology scouting. According to our finding three main variables in technology scouting model are: environmental specifications, organizational characteristics and technology dimensions. In addition, we found that in structural model, there are two main types of technology scouting: scanning and targeting. Deciding about appropriate structure depends to the above-mentioned variables. Finally inspired by technology foresight, we divided technology scouting into three main part: pre scouting, main scouting and post scouting. Each part has its own characteristics and steps.
Keywords
technology scouting
environmental scanning
technology intelligence
technology monitoring
  • Birkinshaw, J. M., & Monteiro, F. (2007). External knowledge sourcing: Uncovering the technology scouting process. AIM Research.‏
  • Brenner, M. S. (1996). Technology intelligence and technology scouting. Competitive Intelligence Review, 7(3), 20-27.‏
  • Choo, C. W. (2003). The art of scanning the environment. Reframing Environmental Scanning, 7.‏
  • Da Camara Monteiro Junior, L. F. (2008). Connecting the dots: Uncovering the technology scouting process (Doctoral dissertation, London Business School (University of London)).‏
  • Day, G. S., & Schoemaker, P. J. (2005). Scanning the periphery. Harvard business review, 83(11), 135.‏
  • Durand, T. (2010). Technology Intelligence, In: V.K Narayanan, & G, O’Connor (eds.) Encyclopedia of Technology & Innovation Management, edited by, Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Eckert, C. M., & Stacey, M. K. (2010). What is a process model? Reflections on the epistemology of design process models. In Modelling and Management of Engineering Processes (pp. 3-14). Springer, London.‏
  • Greene, J. C. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry (Vol. 9). John Wiley & Sons.‏
  • Guemes-Castorena, D. (2009, August). Megatrend methodology to identify development opportunities. In PICMET'09-2009 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology (pp. 2391-2396). IEEE.‏
  • Leech, Roger (2010) Open innovation and technology scouting,  http://www.fdin.org.uk/output/Open%20Innovation%20Innovation%202010/Unilever%20%20Open%20Innovation%20&%20Technology%20Scouting.pps, last visited: 31/05/2016.
  • Lichtenthaler, E. (2007). Managing technology intelligence processes in situations of radical technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(8), 1109-1136.
  • Lichtenthaler, E. (2007). Managing technology intelligence processes in situations of radical technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(8), 1109-1136.
  • Madani, F., & Khormaei, R. (2013, July). Overview of evolution in study of external technology search. In 2013 Proceedings of PICMET'13: Technology Management in the IT-Driven Services (PICMET) (pp. 2058-2060). IEEE.‏‏
  • Matschy, A., & Meng, L. (2010). Using Chinese universities as a source of Technology Scouting in China.‏
  • Mortara, L., Kerr, C. I., Phaal, R., & Probert, D. (2009). A toolbox of elements to build technology intelligence systems. International Journal of Technology Management, 47, 322-345.‏
  • Narchal, R. M., Kittappa, K., & Bhattacharya, P. (1987). An environmental scanning system for business planning. Long Range Planning, 20(6), 96-105.‏
  • Nyberg, A., & Palmgren, S. (2011). Using Indicators for Technology Monitoring. Steps toward a proposed framework.‏
  • Paap, J. (2008). Accelerating Growth Through ‘Open Innovation’: Structuring and Managing Industrial Innovation, ANPEI Open Innovation Workshop, 20th May.
  • Robinson, D. K., Huang, L., Guo, Y., & Porter, A. L. (2013). Forecasting Innovation Pathways (FIP) for new and emerging science and technologies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(2), 267-285.‏
  • Rohrbeck, R. (2007). Technology Scouting-a case study on the Deutsche Telekom Laboratories. In ISPIM-Asia Conference.‏
  • Romero, G., Güemes-Castorena, D., & Villarreal, A. (2012, July). Technological foresight model for the identification of business opportunities (TEFMIBO). In 2012 Proceedings of PICMET'12: Technology Management for Emerging Technologies (pp. 1299-1313). IEEE.‏
  • Rouach, D., & Santi, P. (2001). Competitive intelligence adds value:: Five intelligence attitudes. European management journal, 19(5), 552-559.‏
  • Song, J. (2000). Technological Catching-up of Korea and Taiwan in the Global Semiconductor Industry: A Study of Modes of Technology Sourcing. APEC Study Center, Columbia University, Discussion Paper Series (December).‏

Vecchiato, R., & Roveda, C. (2010). Strategic foresight in corporate organizations: Handling the effect and response uncertainty of technology and social drivers of change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(9), 1527-1539.

Defensive Future Studies
Volume 4, Issue 13
Summer 2019
Pages 41-68