Futures studies of Anti- UAV Products using Robust Prioritization

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Assistant Prof. in Nation Defensive University

2 PhD in Tehran University and researcher in Nation Defensive University

3 PhD in Toloue Mehr Non-profit Institute of Higher Education, Qom

Abstract

The rapid growth of military technology has had a dramatic impact on the shortening of the life cycle of defense products to deal with them, in the meantime, having the benefits of operational sustainability, autonomy, low cost, flexible design and keeping people away from danger, will have uavs as a solution to many future air challenges, which is why the world's armed forces are constantly struggling to keep their defense capabilities up to date with their equipment and weapons. On the other hand, there is an upward trend in the purchase and development of uavs, both armed and unarmed for most troops in the world. Given that this research is aimed at facilitating executive operations and also solving long-term challenges, the type of research has been combined in terms of its functional and cross-cutting purpose and the quantity and quality of research data collected simultaneously. In this research, anti-defense techniques with a futuristic approach have been used, and the importance of prioritization has been used as one of the future active methods of the future.Therefore, Based On the robust prioritization method and the use of experts' comments, The research identifies and evaluates current and future threats from uavs and lists 11 anti-drone products that are more effective against drone threats.

Keywords


  •  

    • Altmann, J. (2013). Arms control for Armed Uninhabited Vehicles: an Ethical Issue, Ethics Inf Technol, 15 (2): 137-152.
    • Balamurugan, G., Valarmathi, J. & Naidu V. P. S. (2016).  Survey on UAV navigation in GPS denied environments International Conference on Signal Processing, Communication, Power and Embedded System (SCOPES), pp. 198-204.
    • Bennett Moses, L. (2007). Recurring Dilemmas: The Law’s Race to Keep up with Technological Change. Sydney: University of New South Wales.
    • Christnacher, F. & et al. (2016). Optical and Acoustical UAV Detection, Proc. SPIE Security+ Defense, vol. 9988, pp. 1-9
    • Gerald, M. (2014). Unmanned Aerial Vehicles And the Future of Airpower: a Technological Perspective Pointer, Journal of the singapore armed for ces, 43 (2): 45-57
    • Hoffmann, F. & et al. (2016). Micro-Doppler Based Detection and Tracking of UAVs with Multistatic Radar, Proc. IEEE Radar-Conf, Philadelphia, PA, May, pp. 1--6
    • Holland, M.A. (2018). Counter-Drone Systems. Center for the Study of the Drone at Bard College, Feburary http://dronecenter.bard.edu/counter-drone-systems/.
    • Jackson, B. A. Frelinge, D. R., Lostumbo, M. J. & Button, R. W. (2008). Evaluating Novel Threats to the Homeland: Unmanned Aerial Vehicles & Cruise Missiles, RANDCorporation, 2008.
    • Lempert, R. J., Myles T. C. (2007). Managing the Risk of Uncertain Threshold Responses Risk Analysis, RAND Corporation, 27 (4): 1009-1026.
    • Lempert, R. J., Popper, S. W. & Bankes, S. C. (2017). Robust Decision Making: XLRM framework, Journal of Conservation Planning, 13 (24).
    • Lynn E. D. & et al. (2012). Armed and Dangerous? UAVs and U.S. Security, RAND_Corporation, may.
    • Pande, P.S., Neuman, R.P., & Cavanagh, R.R. (2002). The Six Sigma Way Team Fieldbook: An Implementation Guide for Process Improvement Teams. New York, NY: McGraw‐Hill.
    • Peacock, M. & Johnstone, M. N. (2013). Towards Detection and Control of Civilian Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, Proc. 14th Australian Info. Warfare and Security Conf., Edith Cowan Univ., Perth, Western Australia, Dec, pp. 9—15
    • Rothe, D. L. & Kauzlarich, D. (2014). Victims of State Crime, London, Routledge.
    • Sukhankin, S. (2018). The S-400–Pantsir ‘Tandem’: The New-Old Feature of Russian A2/AD Capabilities, Eurasia Daily Monitor, Volume: 15.
    • Unido. (2004). Foresight Methodologies, Unido Nations Industrial Development Organization, p. 119.
    • Zhang, Z. & et al. (2016). An Intruder Detection Algorithm for Vision Based Sense and Avoid System, Proc. IEEE ICUAS, Arlington, VA, June, pp. 550--56.