Investigating the key drivers of performance management based on the staff productivity approach (Case study: The aviation industry of Iran)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. in Public Management, Islamic Azad University, Gheshm Branch, Gheshm, Iran

2 Associate Prof. Faculty Member Of Management, Islamic Azad University, South Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran

3 Assistant Prof. in Public Management, Islamic Azad University, Gheshm Branch, Gheshm, Iran

Abstract

This research has been aimed to identify the key drivers of performance management based on the staff productivity approach with a mix research and descriptive-exploratory method. In this way, the key drivers of performance management were identified by Thematic Analysis and were prioritized by Interpretive Structural Modeling. The statistical population included university professors as well as senior human resource managers in the aviation industry. Sampling was done by judgmental method and 14 experts were selected up to the data saturation step. Data were collected through a semi-structured interview to identify key drivers and an expert-based questionnaire to prioritize them. The results led to the identification of performance management drivers, which include; contextual, organizational, managerial and motivational drivers. In addition, the identified drivers based on the experts' opinions were ranked in three levels.

Keywords


  • Adeinat, I., & Kassim, N. (2019). Extending the service profit chain: The mediating effect of employee productivity. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management. 36(5), 797-814.
  • Agarwal, A. (2020). Investigating design targets for effective performance management system: an application of balance scorecard using QFD. Journal of Advances in Management Research. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print.
  • Aguinis, H., Joo, H., & Gottfredson, R. K. (2011). Why we hate performance management—And why we should love it. Business Horizons, 54(6), 503-507.
  • Armstrong, M. (2012). [Handbook of human resource management practice]; Armstrong's handbook of human resource management practice. Kogan Page.
  • Brudan, A. (2010). Rediscovering performance management: systems, learning and integration. Measuring Business Excellence. 9(1), 62-85.
  • Capaldo, G., Costantino, N., Pellegrino, R., & Rippa, P. (2018). The role of risk in improving goal setting in performance management practices within public sector: An explorative research in courts offices in Italy. International Journal of Public Administration, 41(12), 986-997.
  • Claus, L., & Briscoe, D. (2009). Employee performance management across borders: A review of relevant academic literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(2), 175-196.
  • De Waal, A. A. (2003). Behavioral factors important for the successful implementation and use of performance management systems. Management Decision. 41(8), 688-697.
  • Delbari, S., Rajaipour, S., & Abedini, Y. (2020). Investigating the relationship between career development and productivity with the mediating role of self-regulation among university staff. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education. ahead-of-print.
  • Delmas, M. A., & Pekovic, S. (2018). Organizational configurations for sustainability and employee productivity: A qualitative comparative analysis approach. Business & Society, 57(1), 216-251.
  • Ghoddousi, P., Poorafshar, O., Chileshe, N., & Hosseini, M. R. (2015). Labour productivity in Iranian construction projects. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. 64(6), 811-830.
  • Gupta, S., & Prasad, A. (2011). Productivity‐based hybrid model: learning from the Indo‐Japanese and Indian auto sector. Journal of Advances in Management Research. 8(1), 158-171.
  • Kien, B. T. (2012). Factors affecting the fluctuation of labour productivity in the construction projects.
  • Kong, D., Tao, Y., & Wang, Y. (2020). China's anti-corruption campaign and firm productivity: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment. China Economic Review, 63, 101535.
  • Levy, P. E., Tseng, S. T., Rosen, C. C., & Lueke, S. B. (2017). Performance management: A marriage between practice and science–Just say “I do”. In Research in personnel and human resources management. Emerald Publishing Limited.
  • Ma, L., & Ye, R. (2019). Does daily commuting behavior matter to employee productivity?. Journal of Transport Geography, 76, 130-141.
  • Mathis, R. L., & Jackson, J. H. (2011). Human resource management: Essential perspectives. Cengage Learning.
  • McDermott, A. M., Conway, E., Cafferkey, K., Bosak, J., & Flood, P. C. (2019). Performance management in context: formative cross-functional performance monitoring for improvement and the mediating role of relational coordination in hospitals. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(3), 436-456.
  • Mesthrige, J. W., & Chiang, Y. H. (2019). The impact of new working practices on employee productivity. Journal of Facilities Management. 17(2), 122-141.
  • Mohammad, J., Quoquab, F., Halimah, S., & Thurasamy, R. (2019). Workplace internet leisure and employees’ productivity. Internet Research. 29(4), 725-748.
  • Moullin, M. (2004). Eight essentials of performance measurement. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance. 17(3), 110-112.
  • Nakimbugwe, P. (2019). The contribution of performance management systems on employee productivity in Uganda: A case study of TASO Masaka Branch, Doctoral dissertation, Nkumba University.
  • Owino, C. A., Oluoch, M., & Kimemia, F. (2019). Influence of Performance Management Systems on Employee Productivity in County Referral Hospitals of Kiambu County. Journal of Academic Research Business and Social Sciences, 9(3), 1320–1336.
  • Semedo, A. S. D., Coelho, A. F. M., & Ribeiro, N. M. P. (2016). Effects of authentic leadership, affective commitment and job resourcefulness on employees’ creativity and individual performance. Leadership & Organization Development Journal. 37(8), 1038-1055.
  • Shet, S. V., Patil, S. V., & Chandawarkar, M. R. (2019). Competency based superior performance and organizational effectiveness. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. 68(4), 753-773.
  • Sugianingrat, I. A. P. W., Widyawati, S. R., da Costa, C. A. D. J., Ximenes, M., Piedade, S. D. R., & Sarmawa, W. G. (2019). The employee engagement and OCB as mediating on employee performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. 68(2), 319-339.
  • Sylva, W., & Dan-Jumbo, C. T. (2017). Ethical culture, employee intention to stay and employee productivity in the rivers state civil service. Journal of International Business Research and Marketing, 2(5), 7-13.
  • Voiskounsky, A. E., Yermolova, T. D., Yagolkovskiy, S. R., & Khromova, V. M. (2017). Creativity in online gaming: Individual and dyadic performance in Minecraft. Psychology in Russia, 10(4), 40.

Vu, T. A., Plimmer, G., Berman, E., & Sabharwal, M. (2019). Managing employee performance in transition economies: A study of Vietnamese public organizations. Public Administration and Development, 39(2), 89-103.